Violence Against Women Act
Ignores Epidemic Of Violent Women
by Trudy W. Schuett
In the past few weeks newspapers all over the country have been
brimming with accounts of women who engaged in monstrous crimes.
To avoid giving offense, I provide only the sketchiest of details
here: Dena Schlosser severed off both of her daughter’s arms with a
knife. Nathshay Ward starved her three children to death. Kim Tran
mutilated her boyfriend in a gruesome act of revenge.
These women don’t exist, and these gruesome crimes
never happened.
At least that’s what the Violence Against Women Act would have us
believe. Passed initially during the Clinton administration, VAWA is a
$4.9 billion law based on the simple formula: Man = perpetrator, Women
and children = victims. It is aided and supported by similar legislation
in each of the 50 states, and each of those supply more millions of
dollars in public funding.
The formulation has been widely accepted, perhaps because it appeals
so powerfully to male legislators’ sense of chivalry, and plays so
strongly on female legislators’ sense of fear and vulnerability, or in
some cases, revenge.
Feminist ideology elaborates on that formula. The reason why men, and
only men, beat their wives, is in order to maintain their power and
control. It’s all part of men’s “patriarchal privilege,” you see.
Of course, that’s sheer hooey.
In my five decades of existence, I have personally known men who were
physically violent to their wives or girlfriends. These men were
anything but powerful. They were angry, frightened, and yes, they felt
powerless. The same applies to the abusive women I've known.
Psychologist Martin Fiebert has compiled the results of over 100
studies that examine partner violence. The results? Women are just as
likely to commit domestic violence as men.
By ignoring the male victim, the Violence Against Women Act does a
gross disservice to men. That goes without saying. VAWA also violates
one of our most cherished Constitutional protections: equal treatment
under the law.
But VAWA also does an enormous disservice to American women.
VAWA has created a veritable dragnet of social workers, counselors,
judges, emergency room workers, and others. All are on the lookout for
evidence of partner aggression against women. But remember, VAWA
contains the ideological message that women are never perpetrators, so
soon the female aggressor becomes invisible.
Look at Dena Schlosser, Nathshay Ward, and Kim Tran. These women were
mentally deranged. No doubt there were warning signs months and years
ago. VAWA has imposed ideological blinders on our society which say,
“Ignore the female aggressor, because the problem really lies with
patriarchal oppression.”
How does that message benefit women?
It also presumes an insulting, basic disability in women to recognize
a bad situation and deal with it, utilizing their own abilities. Under
VAWA, men are abusive and women are idiots. Only through accessing the
community services mentioned above, can women be “empowered” to give
over their lives to something even more oppressive than that imagined
patriarchy. There is no mention or consideration of extended family
intervention in the truly anomalous instances of abuse, either.
Worse, women who recognize they are harming their families and try to
seek help find only a presumption by strangers that they are actually
not at fault for anything. They are freely given the tools and aid to
continue and escalate their abuse. Any suggestion to women’s shelters
that they make some effort to screen applicants has been met with the
protestation that screening would be “too hard.”
In the meantime, an unprecedented chilling effect has begun affecting
personal relationships. Many of the behaviors which used to be part of
the socially accepted courting ritual are now deemed by the VAWA nannies
to be “stalking,” and therefore any single man who persistently
approaches a woman in hopes of forming a relationship is now at risk of
arrest and incarceration. Young girls are constantly bombarded with
messages at school, in media, and online about the awful risk of contact
with boys.
VAWA has effectively guided society right back into the Victorian
era.
Forty years ago the feminist revolution swept our nation, affording
unprecedented opportunities for women to make their own choices about
their own lives, and to leave their mark on history.
So what will future historians have to say about the current women’s
movement? That it falsely branded our husbands and boyfriends as
batterers? That it ignored abusive women who needed help? That it
substituted compassion and reason for a vindictive gender ideology?
That it made life worse for women?
Will that be our legacy?
Trudy W. Schuett
The Best
Parent is BOTH Parents!
_______________________________________________________________________________________
We appreciate your visit, and value
your feedback! How can we make our site better? It would be very
helpful to know how you found us, what you were looking for when you
stopped by, whether you found the information here helpful, and what
suggestions you may have for future enhancements. If you experienced
any technical problems accessing portions of the site, If you found
a mistake, or have a suggestion as to how we can make this site
better, please let us know. Thanks!
Ron Jagannathan
Webmaster, fathersforvirginia.org
